Commentary: Confronting unexpected results: Edmund Parkes reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
the Parish of St. James, Westminster, during the Autumn of 1854. London: John Churchill, 1855. 17 Koch T, Denike K. Crediting his critic’s concerns: Remaking John Snow’s map of Broad Street cholera, 1854. Soc Sci Med 2009;69:1246–51. 18 York J. Mr York’s Report. Report of the Cholera Outbreak in the Parish of St. James, Westminster, during the Autumn of 1854. London: John Churchill, 1855. 19 Snow J. Cholera and the water supply of the south districts of London in 1854. Journal of Public Health 1856;2:239–47. 20 Simon J. Report on the Last two Cholera-Epidemics of London as Affected by the Consumption of Impure Water. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1856. 21 Koch T, Denike K. John Snow’s South London study: A Bayesian evaluation and recalculation. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63:271–83. 22 Koch T. Celebrating the man, not the myth: The Legacy of John Snow: Epidemiology Yesterday, Today, & Tomorrow. London: London School of Health and Tropical Medicine, 2013. 23 Farr W. Register General’s Report on Cholera in England 18491850. London: W. Clowes & Son, 1852. 24 Sedgwick WT. Principles of Sanitary Science and the Public Health, with Special Reference to the Causation and Prevention of Infectious Diseases. New York: MacMillan, 1901. 25 Frost WH. Introduction to Snow on Cholera: Being a Reprint of two papers by John Snow, M. D., together with a Biographical Memoir by R. B. W. Richardson. M. D. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 1936. 26 Koch T. Disease Maps: Epidemics on the Ground. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.
منابع مشابه
Commentary: confronting unexpected results: Edmund Parkes reviews John Snow.
1 is one of the most famous works in the history of epidemiology. It first appeared as a modest pamphlet in 1849 in the midst of Britain's second epidemic of cholera. A second and more substantial edition appeared in 1855 following another but smaller outbreak , and it is this second edition for which Snow is remembered today. Edmund Alexander Parkes was a logical choice to review Snow's second...
متن کاملCommentary: nobody loves a critic: Edmund A Parkes and John Snow's cholera.
Science isn’t about being right. It is about convincing others of the correctness of an idea through a methodology all will accept using data everyone can trust. New ideas take time to be accepted because they compete with others that already have passed the test. New thinking needs a strongly favoured methodology and an iron-clad application if it is to triumph, replacing the old. Journal crit...
متن کاملCommentary: Edmund Alexander Parkes, John Snow and the miasma controversy.
The advancement of scientific knowledge has often been characterized by controversy, but perhaps none has been more vehement than the conflict between supporters of the rival 'miasma' and 'contagion' theories of disease transmission. During the 19th century , a series of cholera pandemics originated in India and the second of these, which reached Britain in 1831, intensified the debate. 1 At th...
متن کاملCommentary: two views of cholera.
Edmund Parkes was a well-qualified choice to provide a critical assessment 1 of John Snow's second edition of the Mode of Communication of Cholera 2 in the British and Foreign Medico-Chirurgical Review. A former military surgeon, Parkes had extensive experience of cholera in Asia. His monograph, Researches into the Pathology and Treatment of the Algide or Asiatic Cholera, 3 had been published i...
متن کامل